Legal Opinion

Beste v. Saul

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 4, 2020No. 0:19-cv-02585Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINESSOTA LUANN KAY BESTE, * * Plaintiff, * 0:19-cv-02585 RWP * v. * * ANDREW SAUL, * Commissioner of Social Security, * * MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant. * AND ORDER * Plaintiff, Luann Kay Beste, filed a Complaint in this Court on September 24, 2019, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny her claim for Social Security benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 401

et seq. This Court may review a final decision by the Commissioner. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff filed an application for benefits on May 3,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
Geneva Goff v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.