Stephens v. Dixon
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
Murphy, J. (concurring).
I concur in the result reached by Judge Cavanagh, because of this Court’s decision in Hohendorf v Meagher, 188 Mich App 400; 470 NW2d 418 (1991), which adopted the majority opinion in Gagliardi v Flack, 180 Mich App 62; 446 NW2d 858 (1989). Administrative Order No. 1990-6, 436 Mich lxxxiv, requires me to follow Hohendorf. If not so restrained, I would reaffirm and adopt my dissent in Gagliardi, which basically held that the period of limitation does not start to run until the injured party *80knows, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known, that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Filcek v. Utica Building Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Mielke v. WatermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Horan v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gagliardi v. FlackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hohendorf v. MeagherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991