Legal Opinion

Washer v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for Rehearing. The material facts are stated in Washer v. Campbell, ante, pp. 398, et seq., and in the opinion herein, filed at the session of the court in April, 1889.

1Per curiam

This case was decided by this court in December, 1888. (Ante, p. 398, 19 Pac. Rep. 858.) In the Pacific Reporter the figures “52,” in the first line at the top of page 860, should be changed to “42;” and the words “judgment had,” in the sixteenth line from the top of page 861, should be changed to “hearing had.” A motion for a rehearing is now presented. It is still insisted by counsel for the plaintiff in error that the judgment mentioned in the bond, which was to be rendered “on final hearing of this case,” was a judgment to be rendered by the justice of the peace only, and not a judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. C. H. Fitch & Co. v. Manhattan Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. Carlyle v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis Cordage Mills v. Western Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Vigelius v. MarcusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API