Pino v. Ozark Smelting & Mining Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WATSON, J.
Both employee and employer, hereinafter referred to' as plaintiff and defendant, respectively, have appealed from a judgment under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (1929 Comp. § 156 — 101 et seq.), awarding to1 the former (who was admittedly injured in the course of his employment, and whose weekly wage was $24.50) compensation for 100 weeks at $6.12and $350 for facial disfigurement..Defendant objects that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the total blindness of one eye for which the compensation was awarded was proximately caused by the injury.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- De Lost v. Phelps Dodge Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- Christensen v. DysartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Benavides v. E. N.M. Med. Ctr.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
- Martinez v. Zia Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Benavides v. Eastern New Mexico Medical CenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Montoya v. Kennecott Copper CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.