Legal Opinion

Falls v. Soles

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1926No. 19692. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Respondents R. L. Falls and R. W. Robbins brought this action to foreclose a lien for the balance due for material and labor in painting and kalsomining a building belonging to appellants P. B. Soles and wife, in Pierce county. Findings and conclusions were in favor of the respondents, on which judgment was entered foreclosing the lien.

The assignments of error present two points. First, it is contended the appellants were not entitled to maintain the action under § 9980, Rem. Comp. Stat., for the reason that they carried on business under an assumed name and that they did not allege or prove…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laliberte v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Renfroe v. TaggaresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API