Legal Opinion

People v. Carroll

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Mason. Action on recognizance. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

Daniel Shay was convicted in justice’s court and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50, besides the costs of prosecution, taxed at $12.50, within twenty-four hours, or in default of such payment that he be imprisoned, etc. Shay appealed to the circuit court. . The usual recognizance was given on such appeal. Default having been made in the circuit, this action was brought on the recognizance, and Carroll, one of the sureties, defends upon the ground that the judgment of the justice was not authorized by the statute, and could not be the foundation even of a valid bond on appeal. The judgment of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brownbridge v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roop v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  2. Wagner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. Wagner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API