Legal Opinion

Wagner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 9, 1925No. 4261Published

1Opinion of the Court

3 F.2d 864 (1925)

WAGNER et al.

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 4261.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 9, 1925.

Rehearing Denied March 16, 1925.

Marshall B. Woodworth, of San Francisco, Cal., and E. E. Gehring, of Oakland, Cal., for plaintiffs in error.

Sterling Carr, U. S. Atty., and T. J. Sheridan, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for the United States.

Before GILBERT, RUDKIN, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error pleaded guilty to an information, in three counts, which charges them with willfully and unlawfully maintaining a nuisance,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Weeks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  3. In Re DeatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Maine v. SturgisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
  5. Hardesty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API