Legal Opinion

Meola v. Gorga

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 25, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

27 N.J. Super. 390 (1953)

99 A.2d 545

EMILE MEOLA AND ANNA MEOLA, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

FIORE GORGA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 14, 1953.

Decided September 25, 1953.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS

Mr. J. Mortimer Rubenstein argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rubenstein & Kosoff, attorneys).

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for respondents (Mr. John A. Christie, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

The present appeal introduces legal rather than factual subjects for consideration. A sketch of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Naumberg v. YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1882
  2. Grandin v. GrandinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
  3. Worcester Loom Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  4. Gallicchio v. JarzlaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Polakoff v. HalphenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MN Axinn Co. v. Gibraltar Development, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Varriano v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. Ackerman v. CitronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Bartholdi v. DumbekyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Paul v. Timco, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API