Legal Opinion

Christy v. Dana

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1871No. 1,498PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Crockett, J.:

This is an action tp foreelpse a mprtgage made by B. 0. Dana, deceased, in his lifetime, tc the plaintiff, upon a tract of land which at the time was a part of the public domain, but upon which Dana resided, and which he proposed to claim as a preemptor. The land is described in the mortgage as “ fragment of southwest quarter of section twenty-four, and fragment of northwest quarter of northwest quarter, of section twenty-five, township ten north, range seven east, Mount Diablo meridian, being a possessory claim under the statute of California, said land containing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Kirkaldie v. LarrabeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Orr v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Weber v. LaidlerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Adam v. McClintockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Camp v. GriderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Stewart v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API