Legal Opinion
United States v. Omdahl
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 13, 1997No. 95-35753PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM D. BROWNING, District Judge:
Appellee, the United States, brought this action to foreclose on Appellants’ mortgage when Appellants defaulted on the promissory notes owed to the United States through the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA). The district court granted summary judgment for the United States and entered- a decree of mortgage foreclosure. Appellants brought this timely appeal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
I
In July 1982, Appellants executed two promissory notes to the United States, through FmHA in the amounts of $66,270.00 and $28,730.00,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,305 United States of America v. Dos Cabezas Corp., an Arizona Corporation State of Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Ruth G. Thornburg Michael D. Thornburg David Jean Thornburg Kathy Ann NorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- George Mooney v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- UMLIC VP LLC Ex Rel. United States v. MatthiasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Committee of the Russian Federation on Precious Metals and Gems v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
- George Mooney v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Sony Electronics, Inc. v. Soundview Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.