Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Blasdel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1923No. 11604Published

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

In this proceeding in error counsel for plaintiffs in error filed a brief which appears to reasonably sustain their assignments of error.

The defendant in error has filed no brief, and has offered no excuse for failure to do so.

It is well settled that where the plaintiff in error has filed a complete record in the Supreme Court and has served and filed a brief in compliance with the rules of the court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for such failure, the Supreme Court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Silva v. SilvaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Lawton Nat. Bank v. UlrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Incorporated Town of Kusa v. BouggousSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Russell & Washington v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Obialero v. Henryetta Spelter Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API