Legal Opinion

In Re Toyota Rav4 Hybrid Fuel Tank Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 10, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00337Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN RE TOYOTA RAV4 HYBRID FUEL Case No. 20-cv-00337-EMC TANK LITIGATION. 8 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN 9 PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 Docket No. 110 12 13 14 This putative consumer class action is brought by thirty-nine plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) from 15 twenty-nine states on behalf of a nationwide class of “of purchasers and lessees of 2019 Toyota 16 RAV4 Hybrid vehicles, 2020 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid vehicles, 2021 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid vehicles, 17 and 2021 Toyota RAV4…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API