Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfred Fayer

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 24, 1975No. 1191, Docket 75-1147PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

This appeal is by the Government under 18 U.S.C. § 3731. It is from a judgment of acquittal following a bench trial 1 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Jack B. Weinstein, Judge, with special findings of fact pursuant to Fed.R. Crim.P. 23(c). The charge was endeavoring to influence a witness in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503. 2 The Government claims that the trial judge misconstrued the statute to require that the corrupt motive of a defendant be predominant or exclusive and that the court’s special findings permit reversal under 18…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Ingram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Bevan v. Trustees of Penn Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Haupt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. William J. CintoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. In re Grand Jury Subpoena Directing TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Herbert A. Howard and Elmer Gary RitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Ralph CeccoliniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API