VANDERBILT MORTG. AND FINANCE, INC. v. Flores
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANIS GRAHAM JACK, District Judge.
On this day came to be considered (1) Intervenors Maria and Arturo Trevino’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (D.E. 124); (2) Intervention-Defendants Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. and CMH Homes’ Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 145); (3) Intervention-Defendant Kevin Clayton’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 146); and (4) Intervention-Defendant Clayton Homes, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 147). For the reasons explained below, the Intervenors’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (D.E. 124) is DENIED. Intervention-Defendants…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.