Legal Opinion

VANDERBILT MORTG. AND FINANCE, INC. v. Flores

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided October 20, 2010No. Civil Action C-09-312PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JANIS GRAHAM JACK, District Judge.

On this day came to be considered (1) Intervenors Maria and Arturo Trevino’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (D.E. 124); (2) Intervention-Defendants Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. and CMH Homes’ Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 145); (3) Intervention-Defendant Kevin Clayton’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 146); and (4) Intervention-Defendant Clayton Homes, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 147). For the reasons explained below, the Intervenors’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (D.E. 124) is DENIED. Intervention-Defendants…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Construction Financial Services, Inc. v. Chicago Title Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013
  2. MFG Financial, Inc. v. Paul Jason Hamlin and Tara Natalie Bertalan Hamlin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API