Legal Opinion
Relosky v. Sacco
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 3, 1987No. 119 W.D. Appeal Docket 1985PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
In this case we are called upon to decide whether Article IX of the Municipalities Planning Code, which governs the formation and operation of zoning hearing boards, also *342applies to zoning-related decisions of a borough council where the borough has failed to create a zoning hearing board.
Appellants, Ronald and Frances Relosky, are the owners of a parcel of land, identified as lot 250, in the Borough of Ingram. Two buildings are situated on this lot. In July of 1980 appellants listed the rear building, consisting of a three-car garage on the first floor and an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coleman v. Board of Education of School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Shaler Area School District v. SalakasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Porter v. Bloomsburg State CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Rylke v. Portage Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Blank v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ogden Fire Co. No. 1 v. Upper Chichester TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Pendle Hill v. The ZHB of Nether Providence Twp. Appeal of: W. Brophy and E. BrophyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Poulson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Duncan v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- First Avenue Partners, a PA limited partnership v. The City of Pittsburgh Planning CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.