Legal Opinion

Poulson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 2011No. 72 MAP 2010PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this prisoner appeal involving the denial of parole consideration for a life-sentenced murderer, and a subsequent request for mandamus relief to order the Board of Probation and Parole (“Board”) to parole him, the primary issue raised by appellant before our Court is whether a 1965 proposed Senate Bill that was not approved by the General Assembly, not signed by the Governor, and not enrolled by the Secretary of State is nonetheless good law. The prisoner also claims that Act of August 11, 2009, P.L. 147, No. 33 (“Act 2009-33”) repealed the prohibition against paroling inmates…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Stilp v. COM., GENERAL ASSEMBLYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Kilgore v. MageeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  4. Commonwealth v. PfenderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Rode v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fross v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Roana v. Pennsylvania Department of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Alston v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Belser v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Bey v. PENN. DEPT. OF PROBATION AND PAROLESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API