Legal Opinion

Hartwig v. Three F. Conservation Society, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 18, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, with leave to defendant to renew its motion in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order of Special Term denying its motion for summary judgment of dismissal of the complaint for personal injuries on the ground that plaintiffs have failed to state a cause of action. In their complaint plaintiffs allege that defendant was negligent in maintaining a volleyball field containing an unguarded opening or hole, of which it did not warn plaintiff-husband. In their bill of particulars plaintiffs allege that defendant’s property…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Di Sabato v. SoffesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  3. Stillman v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Durant v. Grange Silo Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  5. Koppers Co., Inc. v. Empire Bituminous Prods., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zampatori v. United Parcel ServiceNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hedman v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Linde Hydraulics Corp. v. Kenco Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Scaturro v. MoretAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API