Legal Opinion
Hedman v. City of Rochester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 13, 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Denman, J., not participating. Memorandum: The motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action under CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) was entertained on affidavits and was properly treated by Special Term as one for summary judgment for dismissal of the complaint under CPLR 3211 (subd [c]). Plaintiff alleges that she was injured while playing tennis on a tennis court at Franklin High School in the City of Rochester, that the injury resulted from a ball bouncing off from trash on the court and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Divisich v. MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Koppers Co., Inc. v. Empire Bituminous Prods., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Potter v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Hartwig v. Three F. Conservation Society, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Santiago v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hedman v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1979