Legal Opinion

Board of Drainage Commissioners of New River Drainage District v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1923No. 3794PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

By agreement between the parties the trial judge, upon the hearing of the application for injunction, was to pass upon but two questions, and to grant or refuse an injunction in accordance with his decision thereof. One of these questions was, whether injunction would lie to enjoin the sales of the lands of the plaintiffs, under the levies thereon of the executions which had been issued to enforce the collection of the assessments made thereon, to meet the principal and interest of the drainage-district bonds; it being conceded by all parties that these…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Village of Fort Edward v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Mercer County v. HacketSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Anthony v. County of JasperSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. City of Bainbridge v. JesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Raines v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Bower v. City of BainbridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. City of Beggs v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API