Legal Opinion
Boldt v. Northern States Power Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 2, 2017No. Civil No. 16-232 ADM/SERPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN D. MONTGOMERY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
On February 16, 2017, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Defendant Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy’s (“NSP”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Docket No. 25]. Plaintiff Wade Boldt (“Boldt”) opposes the Motion. For the reasons set forth below, NSP’s Motion is granted.
*957II. BACKGROUND
In January 2016, Boldt sued NSP in Minnesota state court alleging disability discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Minn. Stat. §§ 363A.08 and 363A.17. See…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. STP Nuclear Operating Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
- Williams v. BHI Energy I Power Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Williams v. BHI Energy I Power Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Woodard-Hall v. STP Nuclear Operating Company DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2020