Legal Opinion
State v. Haar
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1980No. 4358PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
The Defendant-Appellant has filed a Motion for Rehearing. We grant the Motion for Rehearing. The former opinion is withdrawn and the following is substituted.
OPINION
ANDREWS, Judge.
Defendant was charged in magistrate court in two counts: one count of criminal damage to real or personal property having a value of less than $1,000 in violation of § 30-15-1, N.M.S.A.1978, and a second count of aggravated battery, a misdemean- or, in violation of § 30-3-5(A) and (B), N.M.S.A.1978. 1 A jury convicted defendant of criminal damage to property and, rather than aggravated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Codispoti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ludwig v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. LyonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. StenzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. AaronNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Stephen Thomas Haar v. Michael HanrahanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.