Legal Opinion

Mendini v. Milner

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1929No. 5091PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, who are respondents in this court, commenced this action to quiet their title to a tract of Carey Act land and the appurtenant water right in Twin Falls county. The defendants defaulted. Mary S. Rutt, assignee of water contract dated October 18, 1907, entered into between the construction company and the original purchaser, intervened and sought to foreclose the lien of such contract under which the final instalment of the purchase price became due on October 18, 1917. She alleged that by written agreement dated February 18, 1922, between the owner of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schmucker v. SibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Fitzgerald v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Johnson v. MerrittSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  4. Chemung Mining Co. v. HanleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lawson v. TrippUtah Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Despain v. DespainIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Lemhi County Ex Rel. Gilbreath v. Boise Livestock Loan Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Trusty v. RayIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. White v. Conference Endowment CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Leland v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API