Legal Opinion
Holland v. Holland
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 2013No. 13-636PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREMILLION, Judge.
LThe Creditors, Chance DeRamus, Evia Hodge, Donald Hodge, and Rachel Hodge (collectively referred to as the Creditors or Interveners), appeal the judgment of the trial court sustaining Kathryn Elizabeth *846Holland and Paul Scott Holland’s exception of no cause of action and exception of no right of action. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On August 22, 2005, the Creditors filed civil suits in the Thirty-Eighth Judicial District Court against Paul S. Holland for sexual battery and molestation of a juvenile. In November 2006,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Vermilion Hosp., Inc. v. PatoutLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Holland v. GrossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Dugas v. DugasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Perigoni v. McNieceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holland v. HollandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Succession of Crute v. CruteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017