Legal Opinion
Holland v. Holland
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 2016No. 16-117PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMY, Judge.
I,This court issued a rule ordering Inter-venors-Appellants, Evia Hodge; Donald Carl Hodge, Jr.; Rachel Hodge; and Chance Earl DeRamus (Intervenors), to show cause, by brief only, why théir appeal should not be dismissed for having been taken from a judgment lacking proper de-cretal language. See Thomas v. Lafayette Parish Sch. System, 13-91 (La.App. 3 Cir.3/6/13), 128 So.3d 1055. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss the appeal and remand this case for clarification.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This matter arose as a divorce proceeding between Kathryn Elizabeth Holland (Kathryn)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nee v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Vanderbrook v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- State v. WhiteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Thomas v. Lafayette Parish School SystemLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Gaten v. Tangipahoa Parish School SystemLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Contreras v. VesperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Melody Smith v. Marcus SamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Simple Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas Property, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017