Legal Opinion

Reidy v. Runyon

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 3, 1997No. CV 95-0578 (ADS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge:

As this Court recognized in its February 10, 1996 Memorandum of Decision and Order, this lawsuit arises from the employment discrimination claims of the plaintiff, James Reidy (“Reidy” or the “plaintiff”), against his employer, the defendant Postmaster General (the “defendant,” the “Post Office” or the “Postal Service”). The plaintiff, a postal clerk, claims that the Post Office discriminated against him on the basis of his disabili*488ty in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 501, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791 et seq., by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas E. Hoar, Inc. v. Sara Lee Corp., Appeal of Greenspan, Jaffe & Rosenblatt, Leon J. Greenspan, Paul D. Jaffe and Victor E. RosenblattCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. Imperial Chemicals Industries, PLC v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Popular Imports, Inc. v. Wong's International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amy v. Kmart of Washington, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Case v. DundomCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Insurance Company of North America v. Kayser-Roth Corp., 92-5248 (1999)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API