Amy v. Kmart of Washington, LLC
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Does a court have authority to hear a motion to compel discovery or a motion for sanctions either in the absence of a CR 26(i) certification or where the certification is allegedly defective? We hold that a court has *851authority to hear such motions, subject to the exercise of its sound discretion. Because the trial court in this case properly exercised its discretion both to hear the motions and to impose sanctions, we affirm the orders imposing sanctions. However, we reverse the court’s decision to grant a new trial.
Cox, J.
*851¶2 The facts are not in substantial dispute. In February 2004, Jada…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.