Legal Opinion
Laurain v. Ernst
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1927No. Docket No. 80PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Plaintiff’s bill, on separate motion made by each defendant, was dismissed. He has appealed. The chief infirmity urged is multifariousness.
John B. Laurain made a will, quoted in part:
“Second: I give to my daughter, Anna Ernst, * * * (described land).
“Third: I give to my son, George J. Laurain, all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate of whatever kind wherever situated. * * * (
“Fourth: I hereby name and appoint my son, George J. Laurain, to be the executor of this will.” * * *
Later testator sold and conveyed all his land except a small parcel, for $30,000, $5,000 cash, remainder…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stender v. StenderMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Torrent v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- The Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Hunton v. PlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Wellock v. CowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Heidelmeyer's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939