Legal Opinion

Laurain v. Ernst

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1927No. Docket No. 80PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff’s bill, on separate motion made by each defendant, was dismissed. He has appealed. The chief infirmity urged is multifariousness.

John B. Laurain made a will, quoted in part:

“Second: I give to my daughter, Anna Ernst, * * * (described land).
“Third: I give to my son, George J. Laurain, all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate of whatever kind wherever situated. * * * (
“Fourth: I hereby name and appoint my son, George J. Laurain, to be the executor of this will.” * * *

Later testator sold and conveyed all his land except a small parcel, for $30,000, $5,000 cash, remainder…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stender v. StenderMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Torrent v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. The Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hunton v. PlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Wellock v. CowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Heidelmeyer's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API