Legal Opinion

Kupfer v. Michigan Clothing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1905No. Docket No. 65PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Assumpsit by Henry Kupfer and Harold W. Kupfer, copartners as Henry Kupfer & Co., against the Michigan Clothing Company for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Plaintiffs are dealers in corduroys, and this action was brought to recover for certain corduroys sold to defendant under a contract entered into by correspondence. On December 1, 1899, one Costuma, a salesman of plaintiffs, sent to defendant a full list of samples of corduroys ; each sample being numbered to denote its quality. All orders thereafter given by defendant were by such numbers. On December 28, 1899, defendant sent in an order for some 12,000 yards, which was not accepted in terms on account of the times specified for deliveries. After some further correspondence, defendant soon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duplex Safety Boiler Co. v. . GardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Cream City Glass Co. v. FriedlanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Schliess v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Foster v. RowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Farrington v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Rice v. Friend Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Remy, Schmidt & Pleissner v. HealyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Jones v. BloomgardenMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Matchless Electric Co. v. Morley Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API