People v. Munn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Following a bench trial, defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1]). On appeal, he argues that the 18-day delay between the close of proof and the rendering of a verdict denied him his right to a prompt verdict (see, CPL 320.20 [3] [d]; 350.10 [3] [d]; People v South, 41 NY2d 451). Inasmuch as defendant failed to object to the delay, that issue has not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Waldron, 162 AD2d 485, 486; People v Wimes, 151 AD2d 1035, lv denied 74 NY2d 822; People v Woodley, 141…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Marenghi v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. WaldronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. HrynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Anthony D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999