Legal Opinion

People v. Munn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Following a bench trial, defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1]). On appeal, he argues that the 18-day delay between the close of proof and the rendering of a verdict denied him his right to a prompt verdict (see, CPL 320.20 [3] [d]; 350.10 [3] [d]; People v South, 41 NY2d 451). Inasmuch as defendant failed to object to the delay, that issue has not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Waldron, 162 AD2d 485, 486; People v Wimes, 151 AD2d 1035, lv denied 74 NY2d 822; People v Woodley, 141…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Marenghi v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. WaldronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. HrynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Anthony D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API