Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Neal v. State Ex Rel. Attorney General

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 11, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

Frank Neal, road foreman of Pulaski County, refused to deliver thirty-five State prisoners in his custody to the sheriff and keeper of the penitentiary on demand, whereupon this petition for a writ of mandamus was filed in the circuit court of Pulaski County, Third Division, on relation of the Attorney General, against him to compel the delivery of said prisoners, naming each and the crime for which he had been sentenced, to the sheriff of Pulaski County, for delivery to the keeper of the penitentiary, basing the proceeding upon a violation of act No. 281 of 1929, approved March 29, 1929, in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. MedleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Rooney v. North DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Murphy v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. Marion v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. J.R.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. In Re JRAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. duPont v. IngramSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  4. In re J. R.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API