Gibson Canning Co. v. American Can Co.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
This is a demurrer to plaintiff’s declaration upon the statute copied in the footnote,1 upon the ground that the declaration is insufficient in that it does not negative the proviso of the statute. It is insisted that exceptions and provisos contained in the same section as the enacting provisions must be negatived in the declaration.
It has been asserted by reputable authority that exceptions and provisions 'do not stand upon the same basis. I shall not attempt to determine whether such is a correct statement of the law, but shall base my deeision upon the assumption…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hansen Packing Co. v. Armour & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936