Legal Opinion

Matter of Finkelday v. . Henry Heide, Incorporated

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 10, 1920, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant in the course of his employment sustained a fracture of his.left wrist. At the time of the accident he was infected with syphilis and shortly thereafter he developed general paresis.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 10, 1920, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant in the course of his employment sustained a fracture of his.left wrist. At the time of the accident he was infected with syphilis and shortly thereafter he developed general paresis. There was testimony to the effect that the latter disease is a development of the former and that the injury claimant received might be an activating factor in its development…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Pinyon Queen Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissonUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  4. Miller v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API