S.F. v. State ex rel. T.M.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCrawley, Judge
I agree that “the interests of the child are our paramount concern” and that the father has a duty to support the child. However, I believe the unusual circumstances of this case would warrant a deviation from the child support guidelines of Rule 32, Ala. R. Jud. Admin, because the application of the guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate.
The father requested a deviation. After the paternity determination, he requested a hearing on the issues of child support and visitation. The trial court granted the request, and during the hearing, the testimony set out in the main opinion was heard.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte BoleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Matthews v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Ex Parte State Ex Rel. SummerlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Ballew v. Charter Realty ERASupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Malone v. State ex rel. GallionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.