Legal Opinion
Hunter v. Reilly
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 12, 2011No. 10-5089PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Upon consideration of the motion for summary reversal; the motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto; and the motion for appointment of counsel, it is
ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. With the exception of defendants appealing or defending in criminal cases, appellants are not entitled to appointment of counsel when they have not demonstrated sufficient likelihood of success on the merits. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be denied and the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The merits of the parties’ positions are…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Ralph L. Stanley, Administrator, Urban Mass Transportation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- McBryde v. Committee to Review Circuit Council Conduct & Disability Orders of the Judicial Conference of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Thomas M. Gaubert v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
4Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Morton v. U.S. Parole Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Fisher v. FulwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Morton v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018