Legal Opinion
Morton v. United States Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 6, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-1112Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WALTER BERNARD MORTON, JR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-1112 (RDM) UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Walter Bernard Morton, Jr., proceeding pro se, is currently serving a parole- eligible sentence imposed under the D.C. Code. Describing his action as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and challenge under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, he brings suit to contest the April 28, 2016 decision of the United States Parole Commission (“the Commission”) to deny him parole until at least April 2019.1…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.