National Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
JACKSON, District Judge.
In the prosaic context of this trademark action two of the nation’s preeminent civil rights organizations contend for the right to use the common distinguishing initials by which both are known and to which each can fairly claim to have added luster. Joined by purpose as well as name for most of this century, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (“NAACP”) and the N.A.A.C.P. Legal De*1339fense and Education Fund, Inc. (“LDF”) are parting company. Over the years in which they labored together, however, they have taught four…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, AKA Naacp v. N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Lucasfilm Ltd. v. High FrontierDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- MGM-Pathe Communications Co. v. Pink Panther PatrolDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- American Family Life Insurance v. HaganDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Michael SalibaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.