Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This case specifically addresses the amount of underinsured motorist coverage imposed upon an insurer who fails to make a mandatory offer of such coverage pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 6(e) (Supp.1977) (repealed by 1980 Minn.Laws ch. 539, § 7).
FACTS
We have considered this case once before. In Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 371 N.W.2d 30, 35 (Minn.Ct.App.1985), pet. for rev. denied (Minn. Sept. 26, 1985) (Osterdyke I), we held a subsequent inadequate offer of underinsurance “tainted” the misleading, but legally sufficient,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clark v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Osterdyke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988