Legal Opinion

Benson v. Coastal Plain Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1974No. 7418DC459PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant argues the trial court erred in submitting question three to the jury. However, the record shows the trial court merely submitted issues to the jury to which both parties *484had agreed. An objection and exception to the form of an issue or to its submission to the jury comes too late when taken after the jury has rendered its verdict upon the issue. Yandle v. Yandle, 17 N.C. App. 294, 193 S.E. 2d 768 (1973). Not only did defendant not object to the issue under consideration, he, in fact, agreed to it. Defendant will not be heard to complain now. Duke v. Insurance Co., 22…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Yandle v. YandleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Duke v. Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Poole v. MesserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Frazier v. GlasgowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API