Legal Opinion

(PC) Ardds v. Hicks

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 31, 2019No. 1:18-cv-01324Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01324-LJO-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND 13 v. (ECF No. 23) 14 D. HICKS, et al., 15 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on 20 September 21, 2018, and the matter was transferred to this Court on September 26, 2018. (ECF 21 Nos. 1 and 3.)…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API