Legal Opinion

Leech's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1910No. Nos. 216 and 217PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeals, Nos. 216 and 217, Jan. T., 1909, by David C. Leech and James S. Swartz, Executors of the will of Henry S. Leech, deceased, and of David C. Leech and S. Josephine Loftus, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Jan. T., 1879, No. 448, sustaining exceptions to adjudication in Estate of William F. Leech, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication.

Read the full summary

Appeals, Nos. 216 and 217, Jan. T., 1909, by David C. Leech and James S. Swartz, Executors of the will of Henry S. Leech, deceased, and of David C. Leech and S. Josephine Loftus, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Jan. T., 1879, No. 448, sustaining exceptions to adjudication in Estate of William F. Leech, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. From the record it appeared that the testator after authorizing his executors and trustees to advance certain sums to his sons and daughters directed by his will as follows: “In any event, the sum or sums which may be so advanced for either of my sons, or…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

We are of one mind that the court below correctly concluded that, upon the death of Henry S. Leech, his share in the income from the trust created by the testator, less the $5,000 appointed to his widow, passed to his only issue, Mary Leech Cotting, and the same having become part of her estate, it was properly awarded to her administrator. Both appeals are dismissed and the decree is affirmed at appellants’ costs.

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wood's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. City National Bank v. StoeckelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Huddy's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Estate of Martin NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Harned's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API