Legal Opinion

City of Ponca City v. Drummond

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1923No. 14397PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LYONS, O.

The parties will be referred to as in the count below. The plaintiffs sued the defendant to recover damages or compensation for the taking and appropriation by the defendant (a municipal corporation) of certain real estate for sewer purposes. There is practically no dispute as to the facts.

It appears that an oil refining company, a private corporation, condemned a right of way across plaintiffs’ lands for the purpose of laying a sewer or drain across said property. The commissioners appointed under the applicable statute in the condemnation proceedings found “that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Cunningham v. Ponca CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Lovett v. West Va. Central Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. LowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. COUNTY COM'RS OF MUSKOGEE CO. v. LowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. United States v. City of McAlesterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. City Of McalesterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. BurmeisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API