State of New York v. Feinberg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
In City of New York v. Saper, 336 U.S. 328, 69 S.Ct. 554, 93 L.Ed. 710, the Supreme Court held that taxes did not continue to bear interest after bankruptcy of the taxpayer; and in United States v. Edens, 342 U.S. 912, 72 S.Ct. 357, 96 L.Ed. 682, it held, the same principle applicable in reorganization proceedings in affirming Per Curiam, 4 Cir., 189 F.2d 876. The present case concerns the reorganization of Huyler’s, which went into reorganization upon the filing of a petition on April 25, 1952. The claim of the State of New York for unemployment-taxes, including interest…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- City of New York v. SaperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. EdensCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- In re Huyler'sDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
3Cited by12 opinions
- 9 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1377, Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,412 in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of City of CambridgeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- In re Boston & Maine Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Jerome Kalishman, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Seymour Wallas and Company, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Sword Line, Inc. v. Industrial Commissioner of State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- In Re New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.