Anesgart v. City of New York
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtVincent D. Damiani, J.
Plaintiffs’ motion to strike out paragraph “fourth” from the answer, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, is granted, with leave to the defendant city to file an amended answer within 20 days of the entry and service of the order herein, in which it may, if it sees fit, raise any specific issue of law or fact as to the notice of claim alleged to have been served on the comptroller. The court is of the opinion that the defendant city should specifically set forth in its answer any defense relative to the sufficiency or timeliness of the said notice, rather than merely admit the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Napiearlski v. PickeringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Stoppick v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Blagburn v. Milrita Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1953
- Palmieri v. Salsimo Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1952
- Stutsman v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1993