Legal Opinion
Blagburn v. Milrita Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Defendant Milrita Realty Corp. moves to examine plaintiffs as adverse parties before trial in a negligence action. This motion is made pursuant to the new practice that became law on July 1, 1952 (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 121-a).
*75Except that the infant plaintiff is eleven years of age, this motion would be granted pro forma. I found but two cases dealing with pre-trial examinations of infants under the new practice, one reported and the other unreported. (Palmieri v. Salismo Realty Co., 202 Misc. 251; Bennett v. Ros, N. Y. L. J., July 14, 1950, p. 69, col. 6.) Courts of general equity…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wheeler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Palmieri v. Salsimo Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of KummerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Arnold v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Anesgart v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958
- Sommers v. Deepdale Gardens Third Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1958
- La Plant v. Atias, New York County Courts1958