Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dunbar v. American University

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1926No. 19881. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— This is an action in the nature of quo warranto, instituted in October, 1924, by the Attorney General for a judgment against the American University of Sanipractic, a corporation, of Seattle, forfeiting its corporate rights and dissolving the corporation. The trial resulted in findings, conclusions and judgment for the relator. The defendant has appealed.

The legislature, at its regular session in 1919, passed an act to regulate and license the practice of drugless therapeutics in this state (Laws of 1919, ch. 36, p. 64) [Rem. Comp. Stat., § 10112], Under the act, appliea-cants for licenses…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Ind. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. State ex inf. Hadley v. Delmar Jockey ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. State ex rel. Gilbert v. Prosecuting AttorneyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Langer v. Gamble-Robinson Fruit Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  5. People ex rel. Golconda Northern Railway v. Toledo, St. Louis & New Orleans RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. State Humane Society v. HoveyWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API