Legal Opinion

Sherwood Court v. Borough of South River

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 28, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

NEWMAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Grande Associates and Sherwood Court (hereinafter collectively referred to as plaintiffs) own apartment complexes in South River. Tenants of the complexes receive electricity from defendant South River Electric (SRE), a utility company owned by the municipality, the defendant Borough of South River. Prior to receiving electric service, tenants are required to complete a request form and place a deposit with SRE. Plaintiffs have either consented to the electric service by general authority given to *476SRE or by specific…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Dunbar v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Key Agency v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HARR, LLC v. Town of NorthfieldDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2019
  2. IN THE MATTER OF SPILL FUND LIEN, DJ NO. 129570-02 954 ROUTE 202, BLOCK 44, LOT 30, BRANCHBURG TOWNSHIP, SOMERSET COUNTY (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API