Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. Sea View, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1951No. 13231_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
The suit of the minor children of Emanuel Weinstein, by their guardian, was for the recovery, under Section 24, Mississippi Code of 1942, 1 of the claimed gambling losses of their father.
The claim of the minors was: that the defendants constituted a gambling syndicate and joint enterprise operating the Broad-water Beach Hotel as a gambling establishment equipped with lounges, bar rooms and dance halls, crap games, roulette and other gambling gear; that their father, to his and plaintiffs’ ruination, had there squandered and gambled away to and for the benefit of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sullivan v. Associated Billposters & Distributors of United States & CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Bowles v. Farmers Nat. Bank of Lebanon, Ky.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Anding v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
- Cole v. GrovesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. BradfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. McCandlessCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000