Legal Opinion
Duerscherl v. Foley
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 25, 1987No. 3-86 CIV 686PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALSOP, Chief Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the court upon plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and defendants’ motion to dismiss or alternatively for summary judgment. Because defendants’ have submitted and referred to matters outside the pleadings, their motion will be treated as one for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c).
BACKGROUND
The convoluted factual and procedural background of this case is comprehensively recited in Voss v. Duerscherl, 384 N.W.2d 499 (Minn.Ct.App.1986). Both the above-cited case and the instant lawsuit are the product of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gill v. RipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Engele v. Independent School District No. 91District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Duerscherl v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Brandsrud v. HespenheideDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- Hodson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.