Planters Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc. v. Chance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
The plaintiff contends that he is not barred by the statute of limitation from, bringing .the present suit because the provisions of Code § 3-808 are applicable, his former suit having been dismissed on the ground of jurisdiction only in that the defendant corporation was not a resident of the county in which the suit was brought. Code § 3-808 provides: “If a plaintiff shall be nonsuited, or shall discontinue or dismiss his case, and shall recommence ydthin six months, such renewed case shall stand upon the same footing as to limitation, with the original case . . .”
“A void suit…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McClendon & Co. v. Hernando Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- McFarland v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Hobby v. BunchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Bell v. New Orleans & Northeastern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Cutliffe v. PryseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- PLANTERS RURAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Radcliffe v. Boyd Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Allen v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Stanley Home Products, Inc. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963