Stanley Home Products, Inc. v. Lucas
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that one hundred and eleven days elapsed between the date the bill of exceptions was returned to the defendant by the trial judge for correction and the date the bill of exceptions was corrected and retendered by the defendant to the trial judge. “If, under Code Ann. § 6-909, a judge returns a bill of exceptions to a party for correction, such party has a reasonable time in which to perfect the bill of exceptions and retender same for certification, unless there is a delay occasioned by providential cause…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gamble v. GambleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Lipton v. LiptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Dade Coal Co. v. HaslettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Boatwright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chambliss v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Woods v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Dowling v. Camden CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966